In
depth
Key Policies.
I will bring information to the
public wherever possible through this website.
I will seek to stop dissemination
of incorrect or misleading information.
I will give public access to everyone
through this site of my voting record at council
meetings. Something which is not easily availiable
from any other candidates.
I will, as far as is practical,
with help from the on-site polls, vote for the
policies that my ward electorate want. NOT neccesarily
what I desire or my party enforce upon me.
I will implement a system where,
should 50% of the electorate in my ward express
a desire to remove me as a councillor then I will
stand down with immediate effect. A democracy should
be judged by the ability of the elctorate to remove
the elected representatives.
I will implement policies from
time to time based upon what the people of Lees
desire in the true spirit of democracy.
More general policy.
Councillors
allowances
I will seek to introduce either a 25% reduction in councillors allowances (instantly
saving around £160,000.00 for Oldham) or more realistically and fairly a system
where councillors are paid for the time spent working. Councillors should be
reimbursed for the time spent on council business, they should not be given a
yearly allowance regardless of how much / how little time they spend working.
Currently a councillor can attend one council meeting in a year, leave after
5 minutes and receive their yearly allowance of £7,720.00 without question.
Thats about £92,640.00 per HOUR!
In 2000 / 2001 you spent £638,293.62 on councillors allowances. Thats £10,638.22
per councillor on average. Allowances ranged from £6878.96 to a whopping £34,636.39.
Bear in mind that these payments are on top of the councillors normal full time
job! Figures for subsequent years seem incresingly difficult to come by.......
Here are some more of the "extras" a councillor can pick up. (2002
/ 3)
| Who gets it |
How much |
How many |
Total |
| Basic allowance |
£7,720.00 |
X 60 |
£463,200.00 |
| Council leader |
£25,740.00 |
X 1 |
£25,740.00 |
| Deputy leader |
£15,440.00 |
X 1 |
£15,440.00 |
| Main opposition party leader |
£12,870.00 |
X 1 |
£12,870.00 |
| Main deputy opposition party leader |
£5,150.00 |
X 1 |
£5,150.00 |
| Minority opposition party leader * |
£2,327.00 |
X 1 |
£2,327.00 |
| Executive member with portfolio |
£10,290.00 |
X 7 |
£72,030.00 |
| Shadow exec members & additional special responsibility
allowances * |
£931.00 |
X 7 |
£6,517.00 |
| Waste disposal authority allowance * |
£1,728.00 |
X 1 ??? |
£1,728.00 |
| Executive member without portfolio |
£5150.00 |
X 1 |
£5150.00 |
| Committee chairs |
£7,720.00 |
X 6 |
£46,320.00 |
| Area committee chairs |
£5,150 |
X 6 |
£30,900 |
| TOTAL |
|
|
£687,372.00 |
| Here's a link to the allowances paid to councillors for
2002 / 2003 pay |
General.
Without speaking to every member
of the ward it is impossible to know exactly what everyone
wants. I
hope to gauge the views of the constituency through open
forums,
regular meetings and via the interactive polls and forum
on the website. There will be occasions
when I might change my own views or policies in order to
encompass the views of the people of Lees. This is, I believe,
what democracy actually means. If 51% of the people who
express an opinion what something to happen then that is
what I should stand up for. Otherwise what is the point
of electing a REPRESENTATIVE ?
Dictionary definition - rep·re·sen·ta·tive
standing or acting for another especially through delegated
authority b : of, based on, or constituting a government in
which the many are represented by persons chosen from among
them usually by election
Top
Racism
I don't really care too much where a person was born, what
colour skin they have, what their religious
beliefs are, or particularly what their history is.
None of those items hold any bearing over how I see those
people right now. Talk to someone in a chat room on the
internet and the last
thing people ever ask is what colour your skin is or which
deity you worship. Talk to somone with your eyes closed
and through a voice disguiser and you would not guess
a person's ethnicity or religion. I'm really more interested
in whether a person is a good person or a bad person.
I believe that a very easily addressed problem is the common
belief that any one group is being favoured at the expense
of another. In practice that is rarely the case but I will
fight for the CORRECT information being delivered to everyone,
initially through this website. As an example, there is a
common view on Fitton Hill that some "Asian" areas
are being funded to a disproportionate degree. That view is
reversed in some "Asian" areas where the belief
is that Fitton Hill is being funded to a disproportionate
degree. Neither view is absolutely correct but while the public
are not privy to the actual facts the views will prevail and
strengthen. One of my policies is that the public will be
granted access to all relevant information. The public would
be best served by being shown information, not by having to
search for it.
I have no time for silly divisive policies where the main
aim seems only to be to pander to any one group. As an example,
the community centre in Glodwick. This is a community centre.
It is in Glodwick. It should be called the Glodwick Community
Centre. It was named the Pakistani Community Centre (PCC).
Why? It is not only for Pakistanis as the name would suggest
and that name (in my opinion) will put anyone off from visiting
it who is not a Pakistani and that clearly is divisive and
unhelpful to all sides. Before I am all too easily branded
a racist I would point out that the example above is one
I am regularly reminded of by people in Lees. The Holts Village
community centre, Hathershaw community centre, Failsworth
community centre etc etc etc describe where that centre is
and the fact that they are community centres. If any of those
were called for instance the English Community Centre or
the Motor Cyclist Enthusiast centre that would be equally
as wrong as a community centre is for the whole community,
not any one section.
Another rather specific point with which I disagree is the
printing of materials and literature in several different
languages. The main language in Oldham and this country
is English, therefore council literature should be printed
in English. I fail to see how printing in other languages
(be it Welsh, Hindi, Russian or Romanian) would either encourage
people speaking those languages to speak English or make
English speaking people more accepting of other cultures.
This is one of those policies where people are kept apart
by the use of separate language and I am in favour of the
majority and of inclusion. Keeping communities apart with
ill thought out ideas like these clearly outweighs the benefits
of covering all bases for everyone. How does it benefit
the speakers of a minority language by saying effectively “you
are different, we have to treat you as a special case, you
are not like the rest of us. You have to remain separate
and different from the rest of the community”. Is that
not some form of racism? Virtually all the rest of the community
cannot understand the other languages and to them it reinforces
the idea that minorities are being pandered to.
All the political correctness surrounding
race issues in Oldham is DIVISIVE and damaging. They divide
communities into“us” and “them” This
council is riddled with race issues which are too "delicate"
to risk addressing. This nonsense needs wiping away and we
need to start treating people as Oldhamers first, last and
everywhere in between, not as assets to be used to promote
one policy or reach a target.
Top
Security
I do not believe there are necessarily
too few police locally. Those police we do have are not free
to do the job they so badly need to do. I would make more
effort to see the police do we have freed from desk duties
and paperwork and put back onto the streets where we need
them and they want to be. To continuously campaign for more
police officers is fine but you have to be prepared to pay
the price of policing.
Some councillors in Oldham have made a big play about having
secured more police for the Oldham area yet that same group
whine about the police authority charging more for their services!
You can't trumpet something as a victory and then complain
that it costs money. Nothing comes for free.
People often say they are happy to pay more but then complain
when their taxes rise. However, on the issue of policing,
I firmly believe that people are more than happy to pay for
effective policing if they see actual results.
I won't be promising anything without pointing out the costs
associated and any side effects that may come with it.
Top
Health
I speak from recent personal experience
when I say that the Oldham Royal Infirmary is an institution
staffed with nurses, doctors and consultants of the highest
calibre. Unfortunately this great institution like its counterparts
countrywide, is handicapped by the government who appear only
to serve the media and their lust for constant league tables
and false targets. I will be campaigning at every opportunity
not just for greater funding for the NHS but more importantly
wiser spending of the money that is put in. There really is
no point pouring water into a bucket riddled with holes.
Top
Transport
I own a car. I own a car because I cannot commute to work
in Uppermill and reach the many other places I need to visit
without allocating hours of time to planning for contingencies
when buses don't turn up. That's why I bought a two seater
car, the smallest car availiable in this country and one of
the most fuel efficient vehicles on the road today. I wouldn't
need it if we had the dream public transport system offered
to us by succesive government and local politicians year after
year after year. I will not and cannot promise pie in the
sky fixes for local public transport as it is an almost impossible
dream. Thats not to say that it cannot be improved. It clearly
can and should be. When a bus or train is timetabled to appear
and it doesn't (without good reason) I want to know why and
will make those responsible accountable. I want to know why
buses and trains are not the clean, safe, reliable vehicles
they are supposed to be. The day public transport arrives
at my door when I want it, going to my destination at the
time I require in a state I would expect in my own vehicle
I'll give up my car entirely. Until then I'll use the car
less when I see something approaching this.
I will campaign for the parking duties in Oldham to return
to the control of the traffic wardens we used to have, not
a private company. I have no problem with private enterprise
but I do have a problem with a company that has to turn
a profit policing parking in Oldham. Of course there needs
to be parking enforcement but it doesn't need to be so expensive
or draconian as to turn people away from town centre shopping.
I also want to see fair policing of parking. It seems some
areas of the town receive special attention while others
are left to do as they please. Everyone should be treated
exactly the same way.
Top
Libraries, Parks,
Open Spaces
In an ideal world there would be a
full library in every ward and the borough would have a copy
of every important book that could be requested and transferred
between libraries. Each area would have green land and open
spaces for people to play and socialise. Bluebirds would flitter
and swoop playfully around our heads. However in the real
world that would not be possible due to financial constraints
and would be impractical. We have to strike the balance. I
strongly believe that libraries are an essential service and
are seriously under funded. I will push for a system to be
put in place whereby a book can be ordered online or at any
library at any time for borrowing through the Oldham council
web site.
We often hear about the “award winning gallery Oldham”
but do you know anyone that has visited it? I think the money
would have been better spent elsewhere improving libraries
instead of closing them. As for open spaces, in my thirty
four years the number of small plots of green land and trees
seems ever diminishing and as I talk to people who have
lived in the borough longer they paint a depressing and
familiar picture of continued housebuilding and loss of
green land. Within the laws of planning applications I will
oppose continuing reductions in our open spaces. Lees is
abundantly lucky in that we have the Linear Park, Lees Park,
the large playing areas near Station Road, playing fields
near Phillimore Street, the park near The Red Lion, the "Cat
Park" on Stamford
Rd and many more. These are assets for the area. We live
in a green part of the borough and I would like to maintain
that.
Top
Other
parties
BNP
(FULL TITLE - British National Party)
I certainly do not agree with the majority council
view that this party should simply be ignored. Like
it or not the BNP are a legitimate party and have
all the same rights and restrictions that any other
party are afforded. The BNP should be argued down
if you do not agree with them. Ignoring them and
hoping they will disappear has patently failed here
and across the country. I certainly would not vote
for them but clearly a lot of people in Oldham would
do and have done. These voters must be offered an
alternative, not just a message of fear from the
other parties. The best solution to a bad argument
is a better argument, not just a louder voice.
Conservative
(FULL TITLE - Conservative candidate)
They are still out there! Until the Tories
look a bit more united and fight the other parties
instead of themselves they will hardly be a force
to be reckoned with. They are in too much disarray
locally and nationally to provide a credible opposition.
Unfortunately I can't comment on their policy because
I cannot find anything about them locally.
Labour
(FULL TITLE - The Labour And Co-operative party
candidate)
Well, they do have a track record to look at and
scrutinise..... If you want your money to be wasted
on pet projects, if you want higher council tax
bills, if you want antagonistic councillors who
are driven by the party line and a deep seated
fear of being "off message" then vote Labour. If
you do want things like toxic materials dumping
in Beal Valley for big cash returns at the expense
of health or postal voting against all recommendations
then Labour are certainly the party for you.
Lib-Dems (FULL
TITLE - Liberal Democrats)
If you asked me which party I most cosistently agreed
with, it would be the Lib Dems. Though I disagree
with a lot of their decisions I do think they have
done a lot of good work locally but they are still
a party and no matter which individual you vote
for they will be voting along party lines. If I
as an independent was in place before now the Lib-Dems
would not have forced through the stupid policy
of charging for bulky waste removals. I also doubt
that it would have happened had the Lib-Dem- councillors
had a completely free vote on the issue.
NF
(FULL TITLE - National Front Put Britons First)
Nothing much to say here. Again a legitimate party
whether you like them or not, but I think their
views are so out of tune with most of the UK that
I would not worry about them seizing power. Still,
any party should be argued down on their policies
and record not on what one thinks they "might"
do.
ANL
(FULL TITLE - Anti Nazi League (and any other passing
bandwagon))
Although the Anti Nazi League are not standing in
Lees I think they bear mention because so many times
I see the protests raised by this party and the
rallies they hold so often in Oldham, jumping on
any passing bandwagon, seizing on the divisions
in this town. In fact all the things they slate
the BNP for. I see this group as being as dangerous
as the BNP or NF in Oldham as they are driven by
the same hate, anger and a desire to divide and
destroy. I have personally heard members of the
ANL advocating violence against a particular group
and asking for particular groups to be silenced,
hampered or even disbanded. Well that's just where
the Nazi party started. If your own message is welcome
enough and people agree with it then take that message
to the people.
(added 24th April - The ANL have again received
coverage (during a time of legally imposed media
impartiality) in the Oldham Evening Chronicle advising
people not to vote BNP only this time the message
has extended to "only vote for the mainstream
parties". So presumeably this unelected group
who cannot be bothered to stand for election now
wish me and the Green party to remain unelected
/ unelectable. Who's next? Maybe the Tories? Maybe
Labour? Perhaps the Lib-Dems? Maybe then the ANL
will bother to actually stand themselves instead
of using their perceived wisdom to guide your voting
preference?)
Top
Religion
Everyone should have the
right to free expression of their views as long
as they do not impeach on another persons view.
Everyone should have the right to worship in safety
whomsoever or whatsover they wish. I really don't
think it is any of my concern what your beliefs
are unless you want to tell me about them (and
I wish to listen) and my views are none of your
concern unless I tell you and you want to hear
them. I am happy to tell you that personally I
am not religious at all because I see the divisiveness
and separatist elitism of the major and minor religions
so often.
That said, I would defend your right to believe
in any deity or belief system of YOUR choice no
matter how odd it might appear to me. As long as
it did not harm or hinder anyone who believes otherwise,
then I wish you all the happiness and enlightenment
in the world.
Top
Local
politics
Well, after attending full
council meetings and area committee meetings over
the past few years I can honestly say that
there are some good things being done and these
are worth pointing out. Something else I will
be able to do as an independent. Unfortunately
there is still a great deal being done badly.
I will not (unlike ALL the other candidates) be
bound by the views of my party. The true benefits
of an independent councillor can be seen where
that councillor can have a mind of their own.
Top
Education
In an ideal world we would
all have a 1 to 1 teacher pupil ratio and all
attend the school of our choice. In the real world
this is totally impractical but we should all
have the same level playing field and common sense
should be the biggest factor in determining school
placements. Why for instance someone in Failsworth
would get an automatic placement at Saddleworth
school is beyond me. Or why an Asian person should
have any harder a time getting into Saddleworth
school than a Christian child would be equally
beyond my reckoning. I would also have to question
the wisdom of teaching any particular religious
leaning in a school (apart from those funded by
a religious group). Is it really vitally important
that we make children believe that a person is
more or less valuable based on the religion they
follow? If there has to be a religion taught then
is should at least be the religion of the country.
Top
Get
Involved
I suppose it is a reflection of the
current nanny state and the compensation culture that I so
often hear the cry "when is someone going to do something
about this" or "who's to blame for this". Well,
this might not be a populist idea but I believe that while
there can be blame and others are often supposed to carry
out a job or service, in a lot of cases the things we complain
about can be tackled by us.
To illustrate this point, there was a story in the Oldham
Evening Chronicle a while back about a teenager who was complaining
that he wanted to play in his local streets (traffic free)
but couldn't because of the litter and he wanted the council
to clean it up. The next line was the statement "we need
to play here because there is nothing else for us to do."
A nice heart-rending story.
Taking any other issues aside, I don't think it takes a genius
to link the two things together here. Could the teenager not
tidy the street himself? Thereby fulfilling two of his own
wishes. He would have something else to do and his street
would be tidy! I really don't think this is a quantum leap
in common sense, indeed a few years ago this would have been
the obvious answer but now it doesn't even seem to occur to
people most of the time. When the council or others need to
carry out their duty they must do it correctly and efficiently
but surely we should do somethings for ourselves? The council
do not (and contrary to some candidates statements will not)
have a magic wand nor a bottomless pit of money for everything
that needs doing in this town. There are occasions where the
towns citizens could also do their bit. I'm doing what I can
at the moment by immersing myself in an election campaign
costing me money and effort for potentially no reward in order
to give people a further option but I cannot do everything
for everyone, nor can any other single person. Communities
have to work together to solve their problems where possible
but I will do my best to facilitate that. "Oldham together"
should mean more about Oldhamers getting together to fix the
problems than Oldhamers standing together complaining about
them.
Top
Political
correctness
I have no time at all for political
correctness. So many times I have sat through meetings where
the points cannot be made properly for fear of offending an
individual or group. Political correctness costs a fortune
in rewording documents, speeches etc to make the language
acceptable to all and the bottom line is that some people
will always be offended by what some other person has to say.
I won't waste time couching all my words in pretty, PC language.
I really do think it's important to say what needs to be said.
If it offends a lot of people then it is clearly a policy,
statement or article that is at fault. If some language occasionally
offends a few people then I'm sorry but this is as close to
a democracy as we have and you can vote for someone else next
time.
Top
Thank you for taking the time to read all
the way down to here. If you disagree with me on more of
my policies than you do of another candidate then please
research their policies and if you find them more attractive,
vote for them, whoever they might be! I'm standing to give
you an alternative. If you've not been persuaded to vote
for me thorugh this site then thanks anyway for listening
/ reading. It's nice to know someone has bothered to find
out all the facts :-) From experience I can say that you
are not the typical Oldhamer !
|